Skip to main content

Hurry—Your gift 2X matched now until December 31. | GIVE NOW

  1. Innovative Science News

  2. Dec 12, 2025

Nonanimal Methods Better Predict Gut Microbiome Toxicity

Study in a Sentence: Researchers tested more than a thousand industrial and agricultural chemicals and found that many nonanimal approaches, including in vitro microbial community assays, computational dose modeling, and AI-based antimicrobial prediction, outperformed traditional animal tests in identifying harmful gut microbiome effects.

Healthy for Humans: Many widely used chemicals, including commonly used pesticides, have never been adequately evaluated for their impact on human health, particularly their effects on the gut microbiome, which is critical to overall wellbeing and related to diseases as diverse as obesity and depression. By using high-throughput, human-relevant methods, scientists were able to accurately predict which chemicals disrupt gut bacterial communities, which are critical for digestion and immune system balance, something animal studies were unable to reliably assess.

Redefining Research: A lack of systemic and quantitative data on chemical exposure, as well as the difficultly in distinguishing the effects of chemicals from other factors like diet and medications make in vivo assessment difficult. This study shows that computational and in vitro tools can overcome the existing challenges in this area of research by providing more predictive insights into gut-microbiome toxicity than animal tests can. This research helps chart a path toward safer chemical assessment and healthier living through modern, nonanimal science. This work, which includes contributions from the Physicians Committee’s own Shagun Krishna, PhD, helps fill a major gap in understanding how environmental pollutants may harm the human gut.

References

Roux, I., Lindell, A.E., Grießhammer, A. et al. Industrial and agricultural chemicals exhibit antimicrobial activity against human gut bacteria in vitro. Nat Microbiol 10, 3107–3121 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-025-02182-6

More on Ethical Science

×