|
Medicine
and Society Curriculum Contents
Section Two: Caring for Patients Living with
HIV/AIDS
The United States Department of Health and Human
Services recently announced a 26 percent decline in HIV- and AIDS-related
deaths between 1995 and 1996.1 The decline in HIV/AIDS
mortality has been attributed to the development of new therapies
in the treatment of people with AIDS and has increased the average
life expectancy of those diagnosed with HIV. It is estimated that
650,000 to 900,000 people are now living with AIDS in the United
States.2
Barriers to Care
In treating people with AIDS, many health professionals
have to cope with their fear of contagion and feelings of having
not learned enough about AIDS during medical training to safely
treat these patients. According to a recent survey of medical students,
71.2 percent believe they place their own safety at risk by working
with people with AIDS, and more than half feel health-care workers
have the right to refuse care to AIDS patients. A minority, only
24.1 percent, say they are willing to perform mouth-to-mouth resuscitation
on a patient with AIDS.3
Another survey found a significant portion of
medical students have a high level of discomfort in dealing with
HIV-seropositive patients, with taking a patients sexual history,
and with homosexuality. A number of students also felt uncomfortable
touching HIV-seropositive patients.4
Such feelings are shared by a significant number
of practicing physicians. According to a 1992 survey, 40 percent
of North Carolina physicians reported having refused care for or
having referred new HIV-infected patients to another physician.4
A similar survey found that 62 percent of physicians are reluctant
to treat patients with AIDS. A self-perceived lack of knowledge,
prejudice against HIV-infected persons or groups at high risk for
HIV-infection, and inadequate ambulatory care training were cited
as possible factors for their trepidation.5
There is no evidence of HIV transmission through
either touching, or the sharing of toothbrushes, utensils, or drinking
glasses. HIV transmission is almost exclusively limited to intimate
sexual contact, transfusion of blood and blood products, and intravenous
drug use.6 There is little risk of contagion during
medical procedures, even when physicians must perform procedures
such as mouth-to-mouth resuscitation, IV insertion, and drawing
blood.
The risk of HIV transmission through mouth-to-mouth
resuscitation, for example, is extremely slim because of low infectious
virus titiers and properties of saliva that inhibit HIV.6
Additionally, physical barriers such as the bag-valve-mask or face
shield offer added protection and alleviate clinicians anxieties.
There is, however, evidence that the human bite
is a potential route of HIV transmission. A bite from a patient
could occur in the hospital setting. It is believed that the blood,
not the saliva, is responsible for transmission, and that the risk
of transmission depends on the degree of injury of both biter and
victim.6 Every effort should be made to eliminate the
possibility of being bitten by a patient regardless of the type
of infection for which the patient is being treated.
There is a high level of concern among health-care
workers regarding the risks of contagion through needlestick injuries
and percutaneous or mucous-membrane exposures to blood or body fluids.
Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are
reassuring. According to a 1997 CDC report:
As of April 30, 1987, 332 health-care
workers with a total of 453 needlestick or mucous-membrane exposures
to the blood or other body fluids of HIV-infected patients were
tested for HIV antibody at the National Institutes of Health.
These exposed workers included 103 with needlestick injuries and
229 with mucous-membrane exposures; none had seroconverted. A
similar study at the University of California of 129 health-care
workers with documented needlestick injuries or mucous-membrane
exposures to blood or other body fluids from patients with HIV
infection has not identified any seroconversions. Results of a
prospective study in the United Kingdom identified no evidence
of transmission among 150 health-care workers with parenteral
or mucous-membrane exposures to blood or other body fluids, secretions,
or excretions from patients with HIV infection.
While the risks are low, there do appear to
be some instances in which health-care workers did become seropositive
as a result of needlesticks and contact between the health-care
workers skin and the blood or other body fluids of the HIV
positive patient. The CDC notes,
In addition to health-care workers enrolled
in prospective studies, eight persons who provided care to infected
patients and denied other risk factors have been reported to have
acquired HIV infection. Three of these health-care workers had
needlestick exposures to blood from infected patients. Two were
persons who provided nursing care to infected persons; although
neither sustained a needlestick, both had extensive contact with
blood or other body fluids, and neither observed recommended barrier
precautions. The other three were health-care workers with non-needlestick
exposures to blood from infected patients. Although the exact
route of transmission for these three infections is not known,
all three persons had direct contact of their skin with blood
from infected patients, all had skin lesions that may have been
contaminated by blood, and one also had a mucous-membrane exposure.
Observing universal precautions can further
reduce the risk of HIV transmission and may have prevented at least
two of these infections.
Universal
Precautions
The universal precautions were developed by
the CDC to help protect healthcare workers from infectious diseases.
The following are the most basic tenets of the guidelines and should
be used with all patients:
- Healthcare workers should wear protective
barriers in anticipation of contact with a patients blood
and other body fluids. These barriers include gloves to protect
the skin, and masks, protective eyewear or face shields to protect
mucous membranes of the mouth, nose, and eyes. Gowns and aprons
should also be worn if the splattering of blood or other body
fluids is a possibility. Gloves should be replaced after contact
with each patient and hands washed.
- Any skin contaminated with blood or other
body fluids should be washed immediately.
- Care should be used at all times to prevent
injury from needles, scalpels, and other instruments. To prevent
needlestick injuries, needles should not be recapped, purposely
bent or broken by hand, removed from disposable syringes, or otherwise
manipulated by hand. Disposable syringes, needles, and other sharp
instruments should be placed in puncture-resistant containers
for disposal; the puncture-resistant containers should be as close
as practical to the use area.
- Ventilation devices, such as mouth-pieces
and resuscitation bags, should be available for emergency mouth-to-mouth
resuscitation.
- Healthcare workers with lesions or weeping
dermatitis should avoid direct contact with patients and patient-care
equipment.
- Pregnant healthcare workers should follow
precautions to minimize the risk of HIV transmission to their
infants.
The universal precautions provide detailed information
protection from infection during invasive procedures, autopsies,
dialysis, and dental and laboratory work. The entirety of the CDCs
universal precautions are appended. You may also wish to seek out
opportunities to work with people with AIDS in order to learn more
about how to meet their needs.
Taking a Sexual History
Physicians can help decrease the spread of sexually
transmitted diseases through prevention-focused education and early
detection. However, few physicians take a sexual history from their
patients. According to one survey, 47 percent of adults patients
have never been asked by a physician about their sexual relationships.
In California, only 10 percent of 1,000 physicians gathered enough
information to adequately identify and counsel patients at risk
for HIV infection.7
Patients are often less reluctant to give a
sexual history than their doctors imagine. In fact, 91 percent of
patients surveyed believe taking a sexual history is appropriate.
A number of studies suggest that a lack of knowledge on sexual health
or conservative attitudes regarding sexual practices prevent medical
students and physicians from taking sexual histories.8
Education programs that include role-play, personal
awareness groups, and persons from the community who are infected
with HIV or AIDS have helped alter physicians attitudes and
behaviors.8
Giving HIV Test Results
All doctors are understandably uneasy delivering
an HIV test result. A patients reaction to an HIV-positive
consultation is a significant factor in whether he or she will be
a willing participant in treatment. Further, the manner in which
the test results are delivered can help reduce suicidal behavior
after notification of a seropositive HIV result.8
The following elements were described by patients
as contributing to a helpful HIV-positive counseling experience:8
- Reassurance of the patients overall
health status
- Detailed and accurate information
- A clear explanation of the information provided
- A high degree of empathy and support expressed
by the physician
- Time to ask questions
- Information about disease progression, symptoms,
and available treatments
The following elements were described by patients
as contributing to an unsatisfactory HIV-positive counseling experience:8
- Having little or no time to express concerns
or ask questions
- Being interrupted during the consultation
and a lack of privacy
- Failure of the doctor to maintain eye contact
by burying his/her head in clinical notes
- Failure to ask about social supports or offer
follow-up consultations
- Failure to discuss progression of the disease,
symptoms, or available treatments
- Failure to reassure patients about their
general health
- Criticism of the patient by the person giving
the information
While doing all the right things during a consultation
may provide the patient with a satisfactory experience,
it is still difficult for most of us to understand the impact of
receiving news many patients perceive as a death sentence. The following
are comments and suggestions from patients drawn from AIDS Care,
1994:8
The one aspect of being told that you
are HIV is that as soon as you find out your mind becomes totally
mixed with finding out how long you have before you die. Because
of this all positive thinking is lost, your ability to think objectively
about the future is muted. I think therefore that the consequences
of a positive result, what would happen, and perhaps life expectancy,
etc., should be discussed before the test is given. Once the test
is given the result should then be available as soon as possible
preferably within 24 hours as then the positive counseling would
still be fresh in the patients mind.
I think that someone really needs a
friend or lover with them at the time they are being told the
results, as very often everything goes blank and really you are
not sure about what to say or ask at the time. Its not easy
walking out of a doctors room after being told you are positive
with just a head full of thoughts and no one to talk them over
with.
As the diagnosis didnt sink in,
the shock came in the presence of work colleagues, which eventually
proved a disaster. I lost my job. I think I should have been given
some advice about not going back to work. Also, I had no follow-up
help. I was left wondering if I was going to die in a few weeks.
I had four weeks of trying to find someone to talk to. I didnt
understand what the diagnosis meant.
Each person is different and will require
different approaches to being given a test result. A flexible
approach is therefore required. Non-judgmental, non-prescriptive,
open, honest, truthful, receptive approach. No attempt to give
false reassurance. Plenty of written information and contact numbers
of Body Positive, Positive Women, etc., plus opportunity for a
second visit.
Clearly, there is no easy way to deliver such
news to a patient. However, counseling skills improve with education
and experience.
Terminal Illness
Terminally ill patients often harbor feelings
of being a burden, being dependent on others for their personal
care, and a loss of dignity. Recent surveys have found that these
are the primary reasons terminally ill patients request physician-assisted
suicide.9 While these feelings are most certainly
shared by patients of all ages, they commonly strike a uniquely
deep chord within younger patients, who are suddenly and unexpectedly
faced with their own mortality and many of the indignities they
had thought were endured only by the elderly and infirm. AIDS is
the second leading cause of death (after accidents) for those aged
25-44.1
<< back to Medicine and
Society contents | top | next
section >>
References
1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Vital statistics
report shows significant gain in health. HHS News Sept. 11, 1997.
2. Steenbok R. Battling HIV on many fronts. N Engl J Med 1997;337(11):779-81.
3. Currey CJ, Johnson M, Ogden B. Willingness of health-professions
students to treat patients with AIDS. Acad Med 1990;65(7):427-34.
4. McDaniel JS, Carlson LM, Thompson NJ, Purcell DW. A survey of
knowledge and attitudes about HIV and AIDS among medical students.
J Am Coll Health 1995;44(1):11-4.
5. Orlander JD, Samet JH, Kazis L, Freeberg KA, Libman H. Improving
medical residents attitudes toward HIV-infected persons through
training in an HIV staging and triage clinic. Acad Med 1994;69(12):1001-3.
6. Sun D, Bennett RB, Archibald DW. Risk of acquiring AIDS from
salivary exchange through cardiopulmonary resuscitation and mouth-to-mouth
resuscitation. Seminars in Dermatology 1995;14(3):205-11.
7. Ross PE, Landis SE. Development and evaluation of a sexual history-taking
curriculum for first- and second-year family practice residents.
Fam Med 1994;26(3):293-8.
8. Pergami A, Catalan J, Hulme N, Burgess A, Gazzard B. How should
a positive HIV result be given? The patients view. AIDS Care
1994;6(1):27-37.
9. Drickamer MA, Lee MA, Ganzini L. Practical issues in physician-assisted
suicide. Annals of Internal Med 1997;126(2):146-51.
Media
Center | Health | Research
| About PCRM | Catalog
| Join Us | Search
| Site Index | Home
The site does
not provide medical or legal advice. This Web site is for information purposes
only.
Full Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
|