Website Metrics and Site Statistics by NextSTAT PCRM >> Research >> Charities Campaign >> Trends in Humane Giving: New Survey Caps Nine-Year Analysis Showing Increasing Support for Charities That Do Not Fund Animal Experiments
PCRM Home
Media CenterHealthResearchAbout PCRM CatalogJoin Us
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
 
gloved hand

 


Humane Charities Campaign


Trends in Humane Giving: New Survey Caps Nine-Year Analysis Showing Increasing Support for Charities That Do Not Fund Animal Experiments
A Report from the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
Autumn 2005

Overview | Survey Details | Results | Discussion | Appendix

Survey Details

Opinion Research Corporation of Princeton, New Jersey, conducted random telephone surveys of the general adult public. The survey questions and response mechanisms differed slightly in each survey. The questions are listed in the box below.

Data collection efforts for all surveys took place at Opinion Research Corporation’s Central Telephone Facility in Tampa, Florida, and/or Tucson, Arizona, using a computer-assisted CARAVAN© telephone-interviewing system. This allows for the most accurate form of interviewing, data collection, and entry protocols. Households were selected for interviewing by an unrestricted random sampling procedure that controls serial bias. One interview was conducted per household, and four attempts to complete an interview were made for all numbers.

Interviews were weighted by age, sex, geographic region, and race to ensure an accurate representation of the total adult (over 18 years of age) population. The weighted total of adults polled for each year was 1,000. Actual totals were 1,006, 1,001, and 1,012 for 1996, 2001, and 2005, respectively. The use of replicable sampling, representative weighting, and standardized interviewing procedures gives all CARAVAN© studies parallel measure, making trend and tracking analyses appropriate.

Responses were given in total, and also categorized according to sex, age, geographical region, race, household income, household size, education, and number of children in household.

Survey Questions/Statements
2005: Respondents were asked to qualify the question based on a “likely/unlikely” scale.

1. How likely would you be to donate to a health charity if you knew that the charity funds animal experiments?
2. How likely would you be to donate to a health charity that had a policy of never funding any type of animal
experiments?
3. When donating to a health charity, how important is it that your donation be used for innovative research
without animals rather than animal research?

1996/2001: Respondents were asked to qualify the statement based on an “agree/disagree” scale.

1. I would be less likely to donate to a health charity if I knew that the charity funds animal research experiments.
2. I would be more likely to donate to a health charity that had a policy of never funding any type of animal experiments.

Respondents could also answer, “I don’t know,” or “I don’t donate to health charities.” These responses are given as “Other” in the results section.

Results >

 


Media Center | Health | Research | About PCRM | Catalog | Join Us | Search | Site Index | Home

The site does not provide medical or legal advice. This Web site is for information purposes only.
Full Disclaimer
| Privacy Policy

Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine 5100 Wisconsin Ave., Suite 400
Washington, DC 20016