Strategies to Reduce Animal Testing in US EPA’s HPV Program
Chad B. Sandusky1, Megha Even1, Kristie Stoick1 and Jessica Sandler2
1Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Washington, D.C.,
and 2People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Norfolk, VA,
USA
ABSTRACT
The High Production Volume (HPV) program was launched in the US
by the EPA in 1998. In an effort to reduce the number of animals
killed in this large testing initiative, members of the animal
welfare community met with government officials and negotiated
several basic principles set forth in a letter from EPA to all
HPV participants (10/14/99), and reiterated in a Federal Register notice.
The goal was to avoid check-the-box toxicology in fulfilling the
basic SIDS data set, which if followed for each chemical, would
result in well over a million animal deaths. Laudable goals included
the formation of chemical categories, the use of existing data
to the greatest extent possible, and similar common sense approaches
to spare animals and still meet the goals of the program. After
more than five years experience and review of over 370 test plans,
the success of this effort is disappointing. Many examples exist
in which companies duplicated testing, for example, if the data
were non-GLP. In other instances, published data existed which
were not used, either individually or in conjunction with other
data (in a weight-of evidence approach) to avoid new animal testing.
Over time, however, some successful strategies were developed by
reviewers in the animal welfare community and in collaboration
with conscientious companies to reduce testing and still meet the
SIDS requirements. Examples of these strategies will be provided
and explored as they might apply to future testing programs.
This abstract is being presented by the authors at the Fifth
World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences,
which is taking place in August 2005 in Berlin.
Media
Center | Health | Research
| About PCRM | Catalog
| Join Us | Search
| Site Index | Home
The site does
not provide medical or legal advice. This Web site is for information purposes
only.
Full Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
|