Website Metrics and Site Statistics by NextSTAT PCRM >> Good Medicine Magazine >> PCRM Brings Lawsuit against Ohio State's gCruelty 101h >> Summer 2005
PCRM Home
Media CenterHealthResearchAbout PCRM CatalogJoin Us
PCRM Home
 

 



Summer 2005• Volume XIV, Number 3

PCRM Brings Lawsuit against Ohio State’s “Cruelty 101”

PCRM has stepped up its campaign against one of the cruelest laboratory courses ever devised—the Spinal Cord Injury Techniques course at Ohio State University, sometimes called “Cruelty 101.” The course requires students to expose the spinal cords of mice and rats and then drop heavy weights on them in a futile attempt to imitate human spinal cord injuries. Some animals have been in so much pain afterwards that they’ve tried to chew through their own muscles. The students then take these “skills” home to their own labs to use on other animals.

What You Can Do

Please write OSU president Karen Holbrook and ask her to cancel “Cruelty 101.”

Karen A. Holbrook, President
The Ohio State University
205 Bricker Hall
190 North Oval Mall
Columbus, OH 43210-1357
Fax: 614-292-1231
holbrook.79@osu.edu

If you are an OSU alumnus, please postpone your donations until “Cruelty 101” is stopped. Sign on to the campaign by contacting Kristie Stoick, M.P.H., at kstoick@pcrm.org or 202-686-2210, ext. 335.

Check pcrm.org/osu for more information, as well as campaign updates.

Since learning of the course last year from Protect Our Earth’s Treasures (POET), a Columbus animal protection group, PCRM’s Kristie Stoick, M.P.H., has been campaigning for an end to it. This Summer, PCRM filed a lawsuit against OSU in Ohio State Supreme Court to obtain videos of the class procedures. At a PCRM press conference on May 23, Carrie Walters, M.D., a neurosurgeon specializing in acute head injury and spinal cord care, elaborated on the failure of animal experiments to advance human spinal cord research. “Decades of attempts to model spinal cord injury using a reproducible animal model have left us disappointed time and again,” she said.

Richard Sorgen, M.D., a bioethicist and radiologist, spoke of the ethical imperative to replace old, outmoded research practices. Stoick described some of the humane alternatives, such as clinical or post-mortem human studies, neural cell imaging, and in vitro cell biology.

As a result, the university is facing increased public scrutiny. All the local TV stations and the Columbus Dispatch have covered the controversy, and neurologists from around the country are getting involved with the campaign. The Lantern, OSU’s paper, even editorialized against the school for concealing footage of the class.

Media Coverage


Media Center | Health | Research | About PCRM | Catalog | Join Us | Search | Site Index | Home

The site does not provide medical or legal advice. This Web site is for information purposes only.
Full Disclaimer
| Privacy Policy

 
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine 5100 Wisconsin Ave., Suite 400
Washington, DC 20016