| Spring-Summer
2004• Volume XIII, Number 2-3
A Rat’s Best Friend
It
is not always easy to save an animal’s life. But PCRM’s
research advocacy scientific staff saves them by the hundreds.
PCRM toxicologist Chad Sandusky, Ph.D., reviews plans for safety
tests submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under
its High Production Volume Challenge program. His job is to show
that animals are not needed, despite the pressure many companies
feel to pursue cruel and old-fashioned animal tests.
Recently, DuPont submitted plans to kill 675 animals to test the
toxicity of a chemical called TIPB, or triisopropylborate, which
is used in pharmaceutical manufacturing. Reviewing the plan, Dr.
Sandusky recognized that the chemical dissolves in water to produce
ordinary isopropyl alcohol (rubbing alcohol) and boric acid (a common
ingredient in eyewashes). If the chemical were swallowed, it would
rapidly dissociate into these two compounds, whose effects are already
well known.
Dr. Sandusky called DuPont and suggested that, instead of doing
the animal test, the company should put the chemical into a solution
with the same acidic conditions as the stomach, demonstrating that,
indeed, no animal testing is needed. Which is exactly what DuPont
then did.
In February, a group of chemical companies proposed a test for
benzenesulfonic acid, a catalyst used in the foundry industry. In
the test, the substance was to be forced into the stomachs of rats
by a gavage tube. However, because the chemical is acidic and highly
caustic, Dr. Sandusky pointed out that it would corrode the animals’
digestive tracts. Not only would the test be cruel, but the data
would be of no value in assessing toxicity. The company agreed,
as did the EPA, and withdrew the test proposal, saving 750 animals
from suffering and death.
And in January, PCRM’s Kristie Stoick, M.P.H., discovered
that Crompton Corporation in Middlebury, Conn., planned similar
tests for a chemical used in plastic manufacturing. Ms. Stoick pointed
out to the company that the tests duplicated others already planned
by another sponsor. As a result of her intervention, the new tests
were cancelled, saving another 675 animals.
Media
Center | Health | Research
| About PCRM | Catalog
| Join Us | Search
| Site Index | Home
The site does
not provide medical or legal advice. This Web site is for information purposes
only.
Full Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
|