|
|
![]() |
The Cancer Project PCRM's Fund for Cancer Prevention and Survival
This is what motivated PCRM to start the Cancer Project. The need for this endeavor was confirmed by the Cancer Awareness Survey, first conducted by PCRM in 1991 with Opinion Research Corporation International to check Americans' knowledge of cancer risks. The initial survey focused on breast cancer and found that only 20 percent of participants had any inkling that breast cancer was linked to dietary factors. A second survey in 1995 showed that awareness of diet and cancer had improved only marginally, to 23 percent. The detailed results were published in Preventive Medicine. Now, four years later, we have completed a much more detailed survey, looking at awareness of colon, prostate, and breast cancer. The dismal results show that Americans' understanding of food is influenced more by fast-food marketing than by any health organization. (See survey results.) Clinical Research
The Cancer Project is now embarking on new studies of the links between diet and cancer. One compares the effects of cow's milk and soymilk on the activity of insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I), a hormone linked to prostate and breast cancer. A second study examines the effects of omnivorous and vegetarian diets on body weight and IGF-I. The Cancer Project does not sponsor or conduct animal experiments. Vital Information The Cancer Project's doctors and nutritionists conduct frequent media interviews. The program has sent more than 2,500 public service messages to television stations and more than 300,000 pieces of educational materials to individuals. The Cancer Project distributes life-saving information to health professionals at conferences and conventions, and our curricula for medical students aim to end the lack of training in nutrition and prevention that marks many medical school programs. Resources Scientific Publications (reprints available)
Why the Cancer Project Funds No Animal Experiments Animal experiments are not only very stressful (and usually fatal) to animals. Results of animal experiments are often difficult to apply to humans. In cancer research, this has been a constant problem. The liver enzymes that detoxify carcinogens differ greatly between species, and cancer itself is very different, not only from species to species, but even from one organ to another. Modern techniques permit the examination of factors that influence cancer risk in human research subjects with no more harm than typical blood tests, and results can be used with no need to bridge the species gap. |
|||