
The Latest In . . .OBESITY
Meat-Eaters Gain Weight
A new study confirms that meat-eating encourages weight gain. Researchers from the
American Cancer Society studied 79,236 young and middle-aged men and women, measuring
their diets in 1982 and again in 1992. Those who ate more than three servings of meat per
week were much more likely to gain weight as the years went by, compared to those who
tended to avoid meat. The more vegetables the participants ate, the more resistant they
were to weight gain.
Previous studies have shown that people who switch to a vegetarian diet become, on
average, about 10 percent leaner. Dr. Dean Ornishs study using vegetarian diets to
reverse heart disease also yielded an impressive 22-pound average weight loss per person
in the first year. Dr. Andrew Nicholsons diabetes study found that a vegan diet
knocked off an average of 16 pounds in 12 weeks.
Part of the problem with meats is their fat content; even skinless chicken breast is 20
percent fat. But meats are also very high in protein and have no complex carbohydrate or
fiber. High-protein, low-carbohydrate diets tend to inactivate thyroid hormone, which, in
turn, may lead to weight gain.
Heart Damage from Fen-Phen
The New England Journal of Medicine reported in August that the popular
weight-loss drug combination, fenfluramine and phentermine, known as fen-phen, caused
serious heart troubles in 24 women. Nine similar reports were already on file with the
Food and Drug Administration.
Each woman had a thickening of the heart valves, which forces the heart to work harder
to pump blood. Five of the women needed surgery for their damaged valves, and eight
developed pulmonary hypertension. The women had used the drug for an average of 12 months.
Fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine were pulled off the market September 15.
Kahn HS, Tatham LM, Rodriguez C, Calle EE, Thun MJ, Health CW. Stable behaviors
associated with adults 10-year change in body mass index and likelihood of gain at
the waist. Am J Publ Health 1997;87:747-54.
SUPPLEMENTS
Caution on DHEA
DHEA has been widely promoted as the elixir of youth, based on animal experiments in
the 1970s and 1980s that suggested that it might be an immune enhancer. In humans, it may
have very different effects.
DHEA, or dehydroepiandrosterone, is sold at health food stores and exists naturally in
the blood as a precursor to testosterone and estrogens.
Joanne Dorgan, Ph.D., of the National Cancer Institute compared 71 postmenopausal women
with breast cancer to other women who did not have cancer. By checking blood serum that
had been stored at the Breast Cancer Serum Bank in Columbia, Missouri, before the cancer
was found, she discovered that the more DHEA there was in the womens blood, the
higher their risk of breast cancer. Those with the highest DHEA levels had four times the
risk compared to those with the lowest levels.
Dorgan JF, Stanczyk FZ, Longcope C, et al. Relationship of serum
dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), DHEA sulfate, and 5-androstene-3 beta, 17 beta-diol to risk
of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention
1997;6:177-81.
BONE HEALTH
Milk Does Not Protect Bones
Milk consumption does not protect against fractures, according to new data from the
Harvard Nurses Study. The study recruited a group of 77,761 women who were between
34 and 59 years of age when the study began in 1980, and followed them for the next 12
years. Those who drank three or more glasses of milk per day had no reduction at all in
the risk of hip or arm fractures compared to those who drank little or no milk, even after
adjustment for weight, menopausal status, smoking, and alcohol use. In fact, the fracture
rates were slightly higher for those who consumed this much milk compared to those
who drank little or no milk.
The findings resonate with international comparisons that show that fracture rates in
Scandinavia and other areas where dairy products are commonly consumed are actually much
higher, not lower, than in Asia and other areas where milk products are rarely used.
The differences are the result of two other factors. First, in international studies,
genetics play a role, with white women at higher risk than other groups. Second, other
animal protein greatly increases calcium loss via the kidneys. Since dairy cattle are
slaughtered when their productivity declines, usually at four years of age in the U.S.,
countries where milk is consumed tend to have plenty of hamburger on grocery shelves. It
may be that meat consumption is what leads to the fractures. Salt, caffeine, tobacco, and
a sedentary lifestyle also contribute to calcium losses.
Feskanich D, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA. Milk, dietary calcium, and
bone fractures in women: a 12-year prospective study. Am J Publ Health 1997;87:992-7.
CANCER
War on Cancer a Stalemate
Eleven years ago, John Bailar III, M.D., Ph.D., published the study no one wanted to
see. After painstakingly going through cancer death rates, he was forced to conclude that
the War on Cancer was a qualified failure. As editor in chief of the Journal of the
National Cancer Institute, Bailar was in a position to know. Cancer death rates were
high and climbing. To win the war, he wrote, we needed to switch our research emphasis
from treatment to prevention. The National Cancer Institute all but ignored his advice and
stuck to its goal of cutting the cancer death rate in half by the year 2000.
Bailars new assessment, published in the New England Journal of Medicine,
is nearly as grim as the first. After peaking in 1991, overall cancer death rates among
men declined only slightly from 1991 to 1994. Rates for women have stayed near their 1991
peak.
Breast cancer rates continue to increase for women over 55 but have declined for
younger women. Lung cancer rates have skyrocketed for older women but have changed little
for men and younger women. Colon cancer rates remain among the highest of any cancer site
but have steadily declined since 1970. Bailar concludes, A national commitment to
the prevention of cancer, largely replacing reliance on hopes for universal cures, is now
the way to go.
More Evidence on Fat and Breast Cancer
A new study in a group of women in Italy showed that saturated fat (the type of fat
found mainly in meats and dairy products) was the element of the diet most predictive of
breast cancer risk. Alcohol was the second biggest culprit.
In a separate report, Ernst L. Wynder, M.D., of the American Health Foundation weighed
the evidence on fat and breast cancer for the Journal of the National Cancer Institute,
finding that the more fat women eat, the higher their risk of breast cancer. Those studies
that have failed to find this association, Wynder concludes, suffered from methodological
problems.
Bailar JC, Gornik HL. Cancer undefeated. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1569-74.
Decarli A, Favero A, La Vecchia C, et al. Macronutrients, energy intake, and breast cancer
risk: implications from different models. Epidemiology 1997;8:425-8.
Wynder EL, Cohen LA, Muscat JE, Winters B, Dwyer JT, Blackburn G. Breast cancer: weighing
the evidence for a promoting role of dietary fat. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:766-75.
BACK PAIN
Tracing the Causes
A major cause of back pain may be nerves that have grown deeply into degenerating
discs. A disc is a leathery cushion that separates one vertebra from another. Normally,
its tough outer sheath covers a soft inner core. If the sheath deteriorates, the interior
tissues can herniate outward, pushing on a nerve root or even on the spinal cord itself. A
break in the disc can also stimulate inflammation, irritating the nerves and causing the
back muscles to tighten up in response.
Sometimes, however, people have pain without any signs of nerve compression or
irritation. The cause may be nerves that have grown into the damaged discs. Normally, pain
nerves do not enter past the outer surface of the disc. But researchers examining
specimens removed at surgery found that, in patients with a history of back pain, pain
nerves had grown well into degenerated discs, following blood vessels that grow as part of
the repair process.
What causes the degeneration in the first place? For many people, the problem is
clogged arteries. The lumbar arteries that nourish the spine are among the first to
develop atherosclerotic plaques. Advanced blockages are present in some
peopleperhaps as many as 10 percentby age 20. A blocked lumbar artery
means that the vertebrae and discs are cut off from their normal supply line for oxygen
and nutrients. They also have more difficulty repairing damage and eliminating cellular
waste products that can irritate nerve endings.
In autopsy studies, people who had a history of back pain have been found to have an
average of two completely blocked arteries to the lower back and at least one more that
was narrowed but not yet blocked. People who had not had back pain had fewer blockages.
A low-fat, vegan diet, along with regular exercise, avoiding smoking, and reducing
stress, can prevent and even reverse artery blockages elsewhere in the body. Perhaps it
can also help prevent or even treat back pain.
Freemont AJ, Peacock TE, Goupille P, Hoyland JA, OBrien J, Jayson MIV.
Nerve ingrowth into diseased intervertebral disc in chronic back pain. Lancet
1997;350:178-81.
Kauppila LI. Can low-back pain be due to lumbar-artery disease? Lancet 1995;346:888-9. |