Dear PCRM supporter,
I am very excited to share two victories for animals with you. The Medical College of Wisconsin
(MCW) and the University of Virginia (UVA) informed PCRM last week that they have
ended the use of animals in medical student training.
MCW was the only medical school that used small animals (rabbits,
frogs, and rats) in physiology courses. UVA previously included medical
students in a graduate level microsurgery course that used and killed 120 rats
These changes are the result of PCRM’s efforts, the support
of our members, and the willingness of MCW and UVA to review and change their
PCRM’s efforts to end the use of animals in MCW’s medical student
curriculum began six years ago when we became aware of the use of dogs in the first
year physiology course. PCRM teamed up with the Wisconsin Humane Society to
stop this practice, but instead of taking a step forward to modern human-based
medical simulation, MCW replaced the use of dogs with pigs. After continued efforts by PCRM, MCW ended the use of pigs as well.
Despite that change, MCW continued to use rabbits, frogs,
and rats in small animal labs. PCRM campaigned against this needless
use of animals, and last week we were informed that the physiology course will
not include animals in the 2012-2013 curriculum. MCW has retained the option to
reinstitute these labs in later years. PCRM will monitor this, but in our
experience terminated animal labs have never been resumed.
Over the past four years, PCRM has reached out to UVA
faculty and administrators to encourage them to discontinue the use of rats in
medical student microsurgery training.
We pointed to the existence of nonanimal training methods,
connected the school with providers of some alternatives, and argued that
medical students do not need to learn the advanced skill of microsurgery. Last
week, UVA’s medical school dean informed PCRM that the animal lab had been
discontinued, stating in part:
“The [UVA Curriculum Committee] voted
to eliminate the microsurgery elective from the medical school curriculum based
on the belief that the microsurgery skills acquired are not necessary for the
M.D. degree. The elective is no longer a part of our curriculum. In place of
this elective, the plastic surgeons will provide a microsurgery simulation
experience using a simulator.”
Unfortunately, while MCW and UVA have decided to make this
necessary change, the University of Tennessee College of Medicine Chattanooga
(UTCOMC) continues to use pigs in medical student surgery training. Please
contact UTCOM executive dean Steve Schwab, M.D., and UTCOM Chattanooga dean
David Seaberg, M.D., C.P.E., F.A.C.E.P., and ask them to replace the use of pigs with
human-based medical simulation.
Thank you again for all of your support, without it PCRM
would not be able to obtain victories like this for animals still used in
medical education and for the future patients of today’s medical students.
John Pippin, M.D., F.A.C.C.
Director of Academic Affairs
Chair, Physician Steering Committee